Outside the window the sky hangs low and grey, the wind cuts through scarves, yet inside the flat the atmosphere feels thick and drowsy. Socks are kicked off, a T‑shirt is enough, Netflix murmurs in the background. Properly snug. And painfully pricey.
A gas bill sits on the coffee table. Meanwhile, a post is suddenly everywhere online: energy specialists are now urging people to cap the heating at 19 or 20 °C. Go beyond that, they argue, and you’re not simply comfortable - you’re throwing energy away. “Comfort is a luxury,” runs the viral line, passed around by furious renters and self‑satisfied minimalists alike.
What used to be a personal preference - the temperature you like in your living room - has morphed into a moral and financial flashpoint. Are the 24 °C crowd selfish energy guzzlers, or just worn‑out people trying to survive winter? It turns out the issue can’t be settled by a single number on a thermostat.
Why 24 °C has suddenly become “too much”
On a freezing January evening in Manchester, Laura, 32, comes back to her rented flat and does what she’s always done: tap‑tap, set the heating to 24 °C. She was raised in a home where the kitchen was so cold you could see your breath, so warmth still reads as safety to her. Within ten minutes the radiators are hissing, the windows start to mist, and the room fills with a rolling wave of heat.
But this winter there’s an extra layer to it. She’s been seeing the claim that each degree above 19–20 °C can add roughly 7 % to your heating bill. All at once, that cosy air feels a little more oppressive. She isn’t only warming her feet - she’s imagining cash evaporating into the room.
Across Europe, energy analysts have converged on the same rule of thumb: 19–20 °C for living spaces, 16–18 °C for bedrooms. Cross 22 °C, they suggest, and you’ve stepped into the “comfort is a luxury” band. It’s not unlawful. It’s not a moral failing. It’s simply expensive - not just in pounds and pence, but in emissions too. Because heating accounts for a large share of household energy use, a couple of extra degrees multiplied across millions of homes adds up quickly.
In theory, the logic is tidy: lower the temperature, cut the bill, reduce the carbon footprint. In real life, it’s untidy. People spend all day working from home. Babies crawl across cold floors. Some renters are in draughty older buildings where 20 °C on the thermostat means 17 °C by the sofa in the corner. Online, the conversation has turned nasty: one camp sees 24 °C as pure waste; the other sees it as a small patch of comfort in a brutal year.
Research bodies keep returning to the figures. The International Energy Agency and national regulators repeatedly tell households that dropping from 22–24 °C to around 19–20 °C can trim 10–20 % off bills in many climates. Let it sit at 24 °C through the whole winter, and the curve swings the other way. Yet every percentage point has a human story behind it - like Laura’s: growing up in freezing rooms, living in an under‑insulated rental, or simply wanting to get home and not spend the evening wearing three layers on the sofa.
How to stay warm without living at 24 °C
Turning the thermostat down doesn’t have to mean suffering; it means changing tactics. The first lever isn’t iron‑willed restraint - it’s basic physics. Heat slips out through walls, windows and floors, and through the tiny gaps you never notice until the bills spike.
For tenants, the fastest improvements are often low‑cost and easy to undo. Put up thick curtains and draw them as soon as it gets dark. Add draft excluders at doors. Use bubble wrap or thermal film on single‑glazed windows. Lay rugs over bare floors. None of it is glamorous, but it can be dramatic: a room set to 20 °C can feel like 22 °C when cold air isn’t creeping around your ankles.
Zoning matters too. Warming an entire flat to 24 °C so the hallway feels pleasant for 90 seconds a day is basically money leaking away. Use radiator valves or a programmable thermostat to keep bedrooms cooler and concentrate heat where you actually spend your evenings. Think in terms of “heat bubbles” in the rooms you use, rather than insisting on one perfectly even temperature everywhere.
A common recommendation from experts is straightforward: choose a sensible daytime band - say 19–21 °C - and keep it relatively stable, instead of bouncing from 16 to 24 °C. Those sharp surges consume more energy because the boiler or heat pump has to work harder to meet a sudden spike in demand. Over time, a slightly lower, steady temperature generally costs less than big swings plus a nightly “heat blast” after work.
Social media is full of guilt and grandstanding. Some people share thermostat photos at 24 °C and get scolded by strangers. Others show off their 17 °C, “just put on a jumper” routine. The reality for many renters is harsher: ageing windows, no say over insulation, ancient radiators. Let’s be honest: hardly anyone really lives like this every day, measuring each kilowatt‑hour like an energy monk.
Most of us have had the moment after a miserable commute when we crank the heating and think, “I’ll worry about the bill later.” That doesn’t make you the villain. It starts to sting when that moment turns into the default from October to March. The useful move is to find your own “comfort baseline” - the temperature where you’re basically fine with a jumper - and treat those 24 °C spells as an intentional indulgence rather than the everyday setting.
Specialists also flag a handful of familiar errors: heating rooms nobody’s in “just in case”; shoving sofas and drying racks in front of radiators; leaving small windows on the latch all day while the heating runs; and skipping maintenance in a rented flat because, frankly, it’s not your boiler. Those are the quiet leaks that drain budgets while everyone fights about two degrees on a dial.
“Comfort isn’t binary,” says UK building physicist Sarah Price. “It’s not freezing or sauna. It’s a bundle of small choices: clothes, humidity, air movement, habits. The thermostat is only one part of the story - we’ve just turned it into a symbol.”
And symbols split people. For some, it’s about dignity: why should anyone be told that 24 °C is “too nice” for an ordinary rented flat? For others, it’s about shared responsibility during an energy and climate crisis. Both reactions are genuine. And in cramped, poorly insulated rentals, tenants get wedged between the two, paying steep bills for mediocre comfort while being instructed to “heat less” in homes that lose warmth like sieves.
- Remember: warmth comes from layers, routines and sorting drafts just as much as from raw temperature.
- Treat figures as guidance, not as moral verdicts on your lifestyle.
- If you can’t change the building, concentrate on the edges: windows, doors, floors and fabrics.
So, is 24 °C always “wrong”?
There’s a quiet reality many experts acknowledge off‑camera: not everyone copes well at 19 °C. Older people, very young children and some chronic conditions often mean higher comfort and health thresholds. For them, the phrase “comfort is a luxury” doesn’t land as helpful advice - it lands as a warning. It can sound like: be cold or be ashamed.
At the same time, energy costs and climate targets are real. Making 24 °C the default, all winter, across millions of flats does bake in higher bills and higher emissions. That tension won’t disappear because of one campaign or one viral graphic. It sits exactly where private sensations - numb fingers, warm feet - collide with public issues - grids, gas and policy.
So the better question becomes less “is 24 °C evil?” and more “when is 24 °C worth it, and who gets to choose?” For some renters, there isn’t much choice at all: the landlord controls the system, or the building wastes heat so badly that the bill is punishing even at 20 °C. For others, there’s space to adjust - to try 21 °C plus slippers rather than 24 °C plus a T‑shirt - without turning winter into an endurance contest.
Perhaps the real split isn’t between the 19 °C people and the 24 °C people. It’s between those who can change their homes - insulate, upgrade, invest - and those trapped making tiny tweaks inside housing designed decades ago. The number on the thermostat has become shorthand for that bigger divide.
Next time you nudge the control up on a cold evening, you may remember the chart about 7 % per degree, or that line about “comfort is a luxury”. You might still go for 24 °C after an awful day - for a couple of hours. Or you might stop at 20 °C, pull on thicker socks, and feel surprisingly pleased with yourself. Either way, it won’t feel like a neutral choice any more. For better or worse, that’s the new atmosphere in our living rooms.
| Key point | Details | Why it matters to readers |
|---|---|---|
| Every extra degree costs roughly 7 % more | European energy regulators often repeat a broad rule of thumb: moving from 20 °C to 21 °C can add about 7 % to heating energy use. Keeping a home at 24 °C rather than 20 °C can mean roughly 30 % more consumption across an entire season. | It puts numbers on how “only a couple of degrees” can turn into a double‑digit jump on your bill by the end of winter. |
| Insulation beats brute‑force heating | Straightforward steps - sealing drafts, hanging thick curtains, putting rugs on cold floors - can make a 20 °C room feel as cosy as a 22–23 °C room with bare windows and floors. Tenants can usually do these without needing landlord permission. | You can get the warmth you want without paying for a higher thermostat setting that mostly escapes through the building fabric. |
| Zoning your flat saves money | Holding living areas at 19–21 °C and keeping bedrooms cooler, while turning down radiators in rarely used rooms, can cut unnecessary heating by 10–15 % according to many housing energy audits. | It helps you spend money on comfort where you actually sit and sleep, rather than quietly heating corridors and spare rooms no one uses. |
FAQ
- Is 24 °C at home really “wrong” from an energy point of view? Not automatically, but it is costly. In a well‑insulated home, 24 °C all winter could be a deliberate luxury. In a draughty rental, it usually means using lots of energy simply to fight drafts and cold surfaces.
- What temperature do experts actually recommend for tenants? Most health and energy bodies indicate around 19–21 °C in living areas and 16–18 °C in bedrooms, with slightly higher targets for older people, babies or those with certain health conditions.
- My flat is freezing at 20 °C. Does that mean I’m “wasting” energy? Probably not - it may indicate poor insulation. Cold walls, single glazing and drafts can make 20 °C feel harsh. In that situation, practical fixes and textiles matter as much as the number on the thermostat.
- Is it cheaper to turn the heating off when I’m out, or keep it low all day? In many homes, allowing the temperature to drop a little while you’re out and reheating to a timetable is cheaper than running the system constantly. Very large swings can cancel out the saving, so a programmer with modest setbacks tends to work best.
- What can I realistically do if my landlord won’t improve insulation? Stick to what you can control: draft stoppers, thermal curtains, window film, smarter furniture placement away from cold walls, and zoning radiators. Keep records of high bills and cold spots; in some countries, they can support requests for upgrades or rent negotiations.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Leave a Comment